Merck Wins a Vioxx Case
Saturday, June 7th, 2008On June 4, 2008, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided that Merck is not responsible for monitoring the health of Vioxx users who have not shown any sign of injury. The court voted 5-1, dismissing a class action lawsuit filed by users of Vioxx who were seeking to have Merck pay for continuous medical monitoring to discover Vioxx related injuries.
In 2004, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered Vioxx to be removed from the market due to a link between Vioxx and heart attacks and other cardiac related fatalities. During the time period of the drugs inception in 1999 to 2003, Vioxx is responsible for more than 27,000 heart related incidents.
In this recent decision, the judges ruled that since the Vioxx users involved in the lawsuit did not have established injuries, they could not establish that the drug caused them harm.
There are defective drug attorneys working to help those who have suffered serious injuries as a result of defective prescription medication.